Meg and Viprin Dating Allegations 2022-2023 Archive
Table of Contents
- TLDR
- Key People
- Evidence and Screenshots
- Dating Timeline and Breaks
- Counterclaims and Analysis
- Two Possible Outcomes
- Context and Notes
- Visual Evidence
- Conclusion
---
TLDR
The archive consolidates a series of allegations and supporting materials about a long-running on‑and‑off interaction between Meg and Viprin from 2022 to 2023, with earlier interactions beginning in late 2021. It documents asserted dating, communications that reference romance and sexual topics, and the behavior surrounding breaks and disputes. It also presents counterarguments and screenshots from Viprin’s side. The material includes explicit statements about age, consent, and the dynamics of power within the relationship, as well as screenshots and timelines demonstrating when dating started and how the narrative has evolved. The content emphasizes that the dating timeline allegedly began in February 2022 and continued through mid-2023, with concurrent discussions about breaking up and getting back together. It also notes that Meg deleted certain messages and that some conversations and screenshots are presented as evidence of a romantic relationship, despite claims otherwise. There are discussions of age gaps and consent, and questions about plausibility and interpretation of the screenshots. The note also highlights manipulative dynamics such as controlling behavior and social isolation. It ends with a call for the reader to decide which version of events is more likely, and a pointer to additional screenshots and conversations that are cited as corroborating or contesting the claims. also he probably likes lolis
Key People
- Alasia/Aquaver/Rylan (friend of Meg and screenshotter)
- Meg (born 5th of December 2005)
- Viprin (born 19th of January 2000)
Evidence and Screenshots
Here is a screenshot of Meg saying that Viprin “ain’t half bad” at talking dirty, and that it’s “their business”. This was sent to Alasia on the 11th of January, 2023. This implies that, contrary to Viprin and Meg’s assertions that nothing sexual happened between them, that they did in fact have a somewhat sexual relationship.
The incriminating message was later deleted by meg, seemingly to cover it up. Here is what Meg said about deleting the messages: (scroll below)
Here is what Meg said about deleting the messages: (scroll below)
Here is proof of the messages being deleted in Aquaver’s dms.
There are more screenshots here.
Here is proof of when they started “dating”. (keep in mind, this IS the word used for it, NOT friendship.)
Here is proof of Meg telling “Dani” that “nini” (a nickname for Viprin) “lovs her dumb ass a lot” and that he didn’t intend to “keep her a secret.” (also another screenshot verifying that Viprin did in fact say that girls said he’s good at talking dirty)
(nini is her nickname for Viprin, as provided by Aquaver.)
Here is a detailed conversation between Aquaver and Meg about “breaking up”, “getting back together”, and “dating all the way to the end of august” as well as her saying that she “didn’t want to” talk a lot to him, despite the fact that they did.
Notice here that they went on break because Viprin was mad at Meg for partying. It is worth noting that someone getting upset at their partner for having a social life outside of them is textbook manipulative behaviour; the intent is to socially isolate the victim, taking away their support system so that they are more dependent on the manipulator.
The two have claimed they “never dated” and yet employ terms almost exclusively when talking about romantic relationships. (see below)
It's only fair to include claims and evidence from the other side. This is a supporting screenshot provided by Viprin’s side of this situation that assert that the two never engaged in any kind of romance:
The response provided (that Viprin rejected these advances) is from the 10th of July 2022, despite multiple screenshots previously shown being from a range of dates both before and after this. It seems extremely convenient.
22 year olds should not be having this kind of conversation with 16 year olds to begin with, especially not a child they have a sustained long-term “relationship” (in their own words) with.
It’s clear that regardless of whether he denied her advances like they claim or not, Viprin allowed Meg to stay in a quasi-romantic intense “friendship” with him for months afterwards. It does not matter in this case as even if his assertions are true, it would mean he spent months continuing this situation with a 16 year old despite being 22.
This is a message from Viprin to aquaver immediately after he was confronted on this inappropriate relationship.
What possible reason does he have to bring up age of consent laws if they weren’t even romantic together, let alone sexual? Why would Meg worry about Viprin being “disloyal” if they weren’t even together? The “plausible deniability” that Viprin and his supporters continuously use to up their claims that the two
1. never at all “dated” romantically
2. never did anything sexual (even joking about it is gross)
3. rejected all of each others’ advances in every possible way
is in direct contradiction with confirmed screenshots.
There are two possible outcomes here:
1. Viprin and Meg are lying about not dating and therefore Viprin cannot be trusted when he says the two didn’t do anything
2. Every single screenshot is conveniently wrong and Meg was simply not in the right state of mind and makes wording errors that no native English speaker would ever make.
It is up to the reader to decide which is more likely.
Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs.
also he probably likes lolis
Visual Evidence
Below are screenshots referenced in the sections above, organized for contextual clarity. They include conversations about dating, breaking up, and the alleged “secret” nature of the relationship, as well as messages indicating the parties involved discussing the nature of their relationship.
!Meg and Viprin dirty talk screenshot 1
!Break up and back together conversations
!Meg and Viprin relationship discussions
Here is a screenshot of Meg saying that Viprin “ain’t half bad” at talking dirty, and that it’s “their business”. This was sent to Alasia on the 11th of January, 2023. This implies that, contrary to Viprin and Meg’s assertions that nothing sexual happened between them, that they did in fact have a somewhat sexual relationship.
>
The incriminating message was later deleted by meg, seemingly to cover it up. Here is what Meg said about deleting the messages: (scroll below)
Here is proof of Meg telling “Dani” that “nini” (a nickname for Viprin) “lovs her dumb ass a lot” and that he didn’t intend to “keep her a secret.” (also another screenshot verifying that Viprin did in fact say that girls said he’s good at talking dirty)
>
(nini is her nickname for Viprin, as provided by Aquaver.)
Here is a detailed conversation between Aquaver and Meg about "breaking up", "getting back together", and "dating all the way to the end of august" as well as her saying that she "didn't want to" talk a lot to him, despite the fact that they did.
Notice here that they went on break because Viprin was mad at Meg for partying. It is worth noting that someone getting upset at their partner for having a social life outside of them is textbook manipulative behaviour; the intent is to socially isolate the victim, taking away their support system so that they are more dependent on the manipulator.
The two have claimed they "never dated" and yet employ terms almost exclusively when talking about romantic relationships. (see below)
It's only fair to include claims and evidence from the other side. This is a supporting screenshot provided by Viprin’s side of this situation that assert that the two never engaged in any kind of romance:
The response provided (that Viprin rejected these advances) is from the 10th of July 2022, despite multiple screenshots previously shown being from a range of dates both before and after this. It seems extremely convenient.
22 year olds should not be having this kind of conversation with 16 year olds to begin with, especially not a child they have a sustained long-term “relationship” (in their own words) with.
It’s clear that regardless of whether he denied her advances like they claim or not, Viprin allowed Meg to stay in a quasi-romantic intense “friendship” with him for months afterwards. It does not matter in this case as even if his assertions are true, it would mean he spent months continuing this situation with a 16 year old despite being 22.
This is a message from Viprin to aquaver immediately after he was confronted on this inappropriate relationship.
What possible reason does he have to bring up age of consent laws if they weren't even romantic together, let alone sexual? Why would Meg worry about Viprin being “disloyal” if they weren't even together? The “plausible deniability” that Viprin and his supporters continuously use to up their claims that the two
1. never at all “dated” romantically
2. never did anything sexual (even joking about it is gross)
3. rejected all of each others’ advances in every possible way
is in direct contradiction with confirmed screenshots.
There are two possible outcomes here:
1. Viprin and Meg are lying about not dating and therefore Viprin cannot be trusted when he says the two didn’t do anything
2. Every single screenshot is conveniently wrong and Meg was simply not in the right state of mind and makes wording errors that no native English speaker would ever make.
It is up to the reader to decide which is more likely.
Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs.
also he probably likes lolis
Proof-of-dating and chronology
Additional conversations
!Conversations about the dating and secret arrangement
Dating Timeline and Breaks
Meg and Viprin allegedly began dating in February 2022, with a period of dating continuing through 2022 up to March 2023, including breaks in March 2022 and August 2022 due to various conflicts. There are multiple references to conversations where Meg explains that they were together and later that they broke up, then got back together, and then continued dating through the end of August. The material notes that the dating terminology was used by the participants, and that the narrative on dating was inconsistent with assertions that they never dated. The tone indicates that the relationship status was treated as a quasi-romantic arrangement by the participants and supporters, despite continued claims to the contrary.
This section compiles the documented statements that would be interpreted as dating language and references to a romantic relationship, rather than friendship, as well as the explicit assertion that dating occurred within the described timeframe.
Counterclaims and Analysis
There are two broad narratives represented in the material:
- The pro-dating narrative asserts that Meg and Viprin engaged in a romantic relationship beginning in February 2022, that they communicated about dating in a manner indicating a romantic relationship, and that screenshots and messages support the claim that they were not merely friends.
- The counter-narrative asserts that the two never dated in a romantic sense and that the screenshots and messages have been taken out of context or misinterpreted. It also argues that the dating terminology is not proof of romance and that the individuals involved may have deliberately used ambiguous wording.
The material presents evidence from both sides, including messages about dating, conversations about breakups, and messages indicating surprise at the idea of a relationship. It also emphasizes concerns about age gaps and the appropriateness of adult communication with a minor, and cites the possibility of manipulation within the relationship. The text asserts that the relationship status, as described by the participants, has been ambiguous and controversial, and that the interpretation of these messages is inherently contested.
It is worth noting that the discussion includes considerations of consent and legality, and that some participants reference age of consent laws to frame the ongoing debate about whether a romantic relationship existed, and if so, under what terms.
Two Possible Outcomes
- Viprin and Meg are lying about not dating and therefore Viprin cannot be trusted when he says the two didn’t do anything sexual.
- Every single screenshot is conveniently wrong and Meg was simply not in the right state of mind and makes wording errors that no native English speaker would ever make.
It is up to the reader to decide which is more likely. Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs.
Context Notes
This archive intentionally compiles a range of materials, including screenshots and quotes from conversations, to present a comprehensive view of the events and claims surrounding the Meg and Viprin situation. It includes textual descriptions of the screenshots, translations where necessary, and commentary on the tone, intent, and potential manipulative dynamics that are discussed by participants. The notes emphasize that the material should be interpreted in light of the possibility of misrepresentation and alternate interpretations of the same messages.
Visual Evidence
Screenshot: Meg acknowledging the dating dynamic
!Meg says 'dating' dynamic with Viprin
Screenshot collage: General chat mentions and references to loli content
!General chat with mentions of lolis and kissing scenes
Screenshot: Viprin's response on dating and consent discussions
!Viprin response about age gap and consent
Conclusion
This archive assembles a set of allegations and counterarguments about the Meg and Viprin situation, including timelines, messages, and screenshots that are cited as evidence of a romantic relationship by some, and as proof of non-romance by others. It emphasizes the need for readers to evaluate the evidence critically and to consider the possibility of manipulation, misinterpretation, and the role of age differences in online interactions. It also notes the presence of deleted messages, the timing of dating references, and the ongoing debate over what constitutes dating versus friendship in these particular conversations. The material is presented with explicit references to dates, usernames, and screenshots intended to anchor the narrative in concrete evidence, while recognizing that interpretations may vary and that the reliability of the sources can be contested.
Additional Notes and Metadata
- The document is presented as an archive to preserve information as of December 6, 2023, with additional observations dated through 2024.
- The content includes references to multiple named individuals besides Meg and Viprin, including Aquaver, Dani, and Alasia, as well as discussions about age and consent laws and potential manipulation.
Image Gallery Summary
The image collection includes screenshots of direct messages, conversations about dating, and posts indicating different interpretations of the relationship timeline. The captions and surrounding text provide context for how these images relate to the narrative of dating, breakups, and ongoing debates about the relationship status between Meg and Viprin.
Endnotes
- Much of the content is presented with direct quotes and paraphrased summaries of conversations. Some quotes are included in full while others are referenced by description alone. Readers should refer to the original screenshots embedded in the Visual Evidence section for precise wording and timestamps.
- The archive includes references to deleted content and potential manipulation, requiring careful consideration of context and possible alternate explanations for the same material.
Important: Equal emphasis on both sides
The material emphasizes presenting both sides and encourages readers to draw their own conclusions based on the documented conversations and screenshots. It also highlights the complexities of interpreting online discourse, especially when age and consent are involved.
Footnote: Relationship terminology
The document frequently notes that terms such as dating, love, and relationship are used by participants, and that there is a distinction made between friendship and romance in some descriptions. The interpretation of these terms is central to the ongoing discussion about whether a romantic relationship occurred.
Note on Content Sensitivity
The archive contains descriptions and screenshots involving sexual content and discussions about age gaps involving a minor. It is intended for an audience capable of handling sensitive information and capable of critical evaluation of sources. The content should be approached with caution and respect for all individuals involved.
For SEO and Navigation
- Primary keywords: Meg, Viprin, dating allegations, screenshots, age gap, consent, online relationships, manipulation
- Related topics: romance, online screenshots, age-gap, consent laws, manipulation tactics
- Internal anchors and Table of Contents have been generated to facilitate in-page navigation and accessibility.
Images (Gallery)
- Image 1: meg-viprin-screenshot-dirty-talk.png — Demostrates a message from Meg about talking dirty; alt text includes the phrase 'Meg's message about talking dirty' with a caption of the date.
- Image 2: aquaver-dms-deleted.png — Proof of deleted messages in Aquaver's DMs; alt text describes the deletion evidence.
- Image 3: dating-start-proof.png — Indicates proof of when dating started; alt text describes dating start.
- Image 4: break-up-convo.png — Conversation about breaking up and getting back together; alt text describes dating timeline.
- Image 5: meg-viprin-relationship.png — Additional screenshots detailing dating/relationship discussions; alt text describes the content of discussions.
Additional Citations (Inline References)
- The archive references posts and screenshots dated January 11, 2023; July 10, 2022; July 3, 2022; March 7th 2022; and other timestamps that align with the dating timeline and the subsequent disclosures. Citations correspond to the embedded screenshots and the described conversations.
Final Note
This JSON export preserves the full content of the uploaded document, including quotes, claims, counterclaims, and visual evidence, organized for SEO-friendly presentation and easy navigation. It is intended as a comprehensive data export for reconstructing the original material as accurately as possible.